[ Buy Pokemon Slavery at Amazon ] By PoP#9 1 on July 12th, 2008 No Printable Available [ Box updated on July 23rd, 2008 ] [ original ] Pokemon Slavery Box Cover Comments Comment on PoP#9's Pokemon Slavery Box Art / Cover. Cancel Reply PoP#9 1 [ 1 decade ago ] the badness of thi box is on purpose. hope you like it. [ Reply ] Ninty 43 [ 1 decade ago ] MY GOD, for some reason i laughed XD [ Reply ] PoP#9 1 [ 1 decade ago ] c/cc is welcom [ Reply ] solardestruction 22 [ 1 decade ago ] *throws PC out window* [ Reply ] SilentMan101 44 [ 1 decade ago ] Ok if your gonna make a satire box at lease make it good. [ Reply ] nintendowii124 1 [ 1 decade ago ] JEEZ ITS SO D*** TERRIBLE! Everything is choppy, get a real template, esrb too close to the edge, etc. [ Reply ] ojoe2000 29 [ 1 decade ago ] stop making these shit boxes as I said on another one of yours "Its not fair to people who put effert into to theres" You probally just bump a decent box off. [ Reply ] crysomemore 29 [ 1 decade ago ] Would've laughed but i was too distracted by its downright ugliness. [ Reply ] PoP#9 1 [ 1 decade ago ] #7 dirty mouth [ Reply ] PoP#9 1 [ 1 decade ago ] i updated it so now its better! [ Reply ] xIAMHUNTERx 43 [ 1 decade ago ] #10, No you didn't. [ Reply ] PoP#9 1 [ 1 decade ago ] well its better than before isnt it [ Reply ]
the badness of thi box is on purpose.
hope you like it.
[ Reply ]
MY GOD, for some reason i laughed XD
[ Reply ]
c/cc is welcom
[ Reply ]
*throws PC out window*
[ Reply ]
Ok if your gonna make a satire box at lease make it good.
[ Reply ]
JEEZ ITS SO D*** TERRIBLE! Everything is choppy, get a real template, esrb too close to the edge, etc.
[ Reply ]
stop making these shit boxes as I said on another one of yours "Its not fair to people who put effert into to theres" You probally just bump a decent box off.
[ Reply ]
Would've laughed but i was too distracted by its downright ugliness.
[ Reply ]
#7 dirty mouth
[ Reply ]
i updated it so now its better!
[ Reply ]
#10, No you didn't.
[ Reply ]
well its better than before isnt it
[ Reply ]