game Xbox 360 » Halo 3 Box Cover
views 3,817   favorites 0  


Halo 3 box art cover
By avatar DesertTigerStorm 1 on May 28th, 2006
print No Printable Available

comments Halo 3 Box Cover Comments


Comment on DesertTigerStorm's Halo 3 Box Art / Cover.

avatar
Ice Forge 2 [ 1 decade ago ]

The blurb on the back is hilariously awesome.

[ Reply ]


avatar
All Hail The New Flesh 7 [ 1 decade ago ]

I'm sorry but its terrible

[ Reply ]


avatar
DeadPixels 24 [ 1 decade ago ]

Its so bad, its good.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Ahazi 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

1. Its a paint job
2. the back and spine arent 360
3. the cover is backwards.
(Back is suppose to be on the left)
4. Its just plain bad.

[ Reply ]


avatar
JonnyJM 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

that desription on the back doesn't make alot of sense :S

[ Reply ]


avatar
Lodovicok 27 [ 1 decade ago ]

right then, lets start with the the right side of the pic. There is bad grammar in the white box and its white which is always bad.
The middle of the box does not have the 360 logo at the top and the logo that is there is pixlated. The final part is also pixelated with the h3 logo covering his face and the two logos at the bottom being boxed.
To finish things off it the wrong way around.

I am not in any way saying stop trying....I am saying get better. Trust me, inn my first week at the site I was arguably worst than you. Yet thankfully back then you could delete your work.

-Lodovicok

[ Reply ]


avatar
HellKnight 27 [ 1 decade ago ]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH enough said...........

[ Reply ]


avatar
WickedGamer1 37 [ 1 decade ago ]

this has got to be the greatest box ever made.
ever.

[ Reply ]


avatar
GAMER4EVER 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

Wow... a square box for an Xbox game... is this something new? [/sarcasm]

[ Reply ]


avatar
markybee23 7 [ 1 decade ago ]

its the wrong way around isnt it? shouldnt the front cover be on the right? or is that me?

[ Reply ]


avatar
g-ram13 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

the so called "front" picture is too smushed up and the temp is too blurry ood try though

[ Reply ]