#6, There's not much typography on the font to judge, if any really. But with the back, you could have really chose a more attractive font. I mean, the font you chose was so bland and boring, and you should really consider adding more to the front before revising anything else really.
I like what you have going on here but the front, as has been said, is pretty dull and empty. I suggest you add some more characters at the top and bottom in the same style as the old man on the back. Maybe you should clean up the logo as well.
Nice back but I would have something in the top of the front. Not quite sure what but something at any rate.
[ Reply ]
This is great! 4.5/5. +fav.
[ Reply ]
The back is pretty good, but the front is absolutely horrible. It's so generic and empty, it's sickening.
The typography on the back could be a bit better too.
[ Reply ]
Looks good all bar that empty top space up there. Other than that, sweeeeet.
[ Reply ]
#3, That's... encouraging.
[ Reply ]
#3, Exactly what could be done to enhance the front and the back's typography?
[ Reply ]
#6, There's not much typography on the font to judge, if any really. But with the back, you could have really chose a more attractive font. I mean, the font you chose was so bland and boring, and you should really consider adding more to the front before revising anything else really.
#5, I tell it like it is.
[ Reply ]
I like what you have going on here but the front, as has been said, is pretty dull and empty. I suggest you add some more characters at the top and bottom in the same style as the old man on the back. Maybe you should clean up the logo as well.
[ Reply ]