[ Buy Tom Clancy's... at Amazon ] By KILLERMIKE 5 on March 20th, 2007 No Printable Available Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter 3 Box Cover Comments Comment on KILLERMIKE's Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter 3 Box Art / Cover. Cancel Reply sockeymeow 25 [ 1 decade ago ] Its pretty good but you need a tom clancy sidebar [ Reply ] CruSadEr 10 [ 1 decade ago ] SLOW DOWN. [ Reply ] CruSadEr 10 [ 1 decade ago ] #2, sorry wrong person. This is good. [ Reply ] Ratchetcomand 8 [ 1 decade ago ] Not bad KILLERMIKE [ Reply ] triviumfan 1 [ 1 decade ago ] not bad. nnope it horible. to early and jus plane bad. [ Reply ] KILLERMIKE 5 [ 1 decade ago ] #5, woah!!well i could care less whatnyou think...dumbass too early?so what!!!!.explain how its bad...(excuse my laungauge) [ Reply ] DeathSpawn11 47 [ 1 decade ago ] #6, he's not being a dumbass it is really bad [ Reply ] KILLERMIKE 5 [ 1 decade ago ] #7, lalalal oh it's you....geez [ Reply ] Ninjamojo27 37 [ 1 decade ago ] #8, Lalalal oh its YOU. [ Reply ] Lodovicok 27 [ 1 decade ago ] Mike, you making an ass of yourself. it's bad because there is a huge black box around the logo. The blending is terrible, the colour choice of light blue and black is ok, but could have been better. And the 3 there just looks incredibly stupid. [ Reply ]
Its pretty good but you need a tom clancy sidebar
[ Reply ]
SLOW DOWN.
[ Reply ]
#2, sorry wrong person. This is good.
[ Reply ]
Not bad KILLERMIKE
[ Reply ]
not bad.
nnope it horible.
to early and jus plane bad.
[ Reply ]
#5, woah!!well i could care less whatnyou think...dumbass too early?so what!!!!.explain how its bad...(excuse my laungauge)
[ Reply ]
#6, he's not being a dumbass it is really bad
[ Reply ]
#7, lalalal oh it's you....geez
[ Reply ]
#8, Lalalal oh its YOU.
[ Reply ]
Mike, you making an ass of yourself. it's bad because there is a huge black box around the logo. The blending is terrible, the colour choice of light blue and black is ok, but could have been better. And the 3 there just looks incredibly stupid.
[ Reply ]