nice box you made but the reflection should be more realitive
and i don't understand the background why do you hide mario and bowser's face
and thank's for making this brilliant box it brought me memories of n64
Expansion Pak support... very interesiting, my Mario Kart 64 has not this feature.... and I bet you have used my temp link , look at the "only for" there are the same lines,because I've scaned a PAL-Box to have a temp... very mysterious. Why no credit?
But box is not bad.
My first box.
[ Reply ]
Pretty cool but a little bit plain in some places
[ Reply ]
I dont like how you made the reflection along with the background. But its alright for a first box
[ Reply ]
Thanks, I'll try harder next time.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
nice box you made but the reflection should be more realitive
and i don't understand the background why do you hide mario and bowser's face
and thank's for making this brilliant box it brought me memories of n64
[ Reply ]
I like it! All you need is an ESRB rating.(E) However I find the reflection and background to be quite ackward... But better than I can do! 4.5/5
[ Reply ]
#6, he doesn't need an esrb rating because this is a pal box
[ Reply ]
"yeestaynes" sounds like peestains
[ Reply ]
Guys...isn't that the offical box for the pal region? I swear it is...though I haven't seen a MarioKart 64 box in like 5 years so I might be wrong.
[ Reply ]
#9 Here's is the official Mario Kart 64 box:http://www.nintendomaniacs.com/images/ul2/box_mk64_pal.jpg
[ Reply ]
Expansion Pak support... very interesiting, my Mario Kart 64 has not this feature.... and I bet you have used my temp link , look at the "only for" there are the same lines,because I've scaned a PAL-Box to have a temp... very mysterious. Why no credit?
But box is not bad.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
#11 Sorry, my fault... credit to Der Evo for the temp.
Edited at 1 decade ago
[ Reply ]
looks pretty good. kinda just a zoomed out version of the original one. but it doesnt show those charaters. So its true its not just a copy. 5/5
[ Reply ]