game Xbox 360 » Halo 3 Diamond Edition Box Cover
views 3,551   favorites 2 (?)  


Halo 3 Diamond Edition box cover
By avatar Viper 1 on December 14th, 2006
print No Printable Available

comments Halo 3 Diamond Edition Box Cover Comments


Comment on Viper's Halo 3 Diamond Edition Box Art / Cover.

avatar
Viper 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

my 2nd box, i think its a good concept =D

[ Reply ]


avatar
Radioactive Bob 38 [ 1 decade ago ]

It's a unique idea, but the Halo logo is very hard to see. And, overall, it's rather plain. Even for a special edition box. (even though it isn't special edition, you know what I mean)

[ Reply ]


avatar
Ratchetcomand 8 [ 1 decade ago ]

I don't know what to give this....I'll wait for a bit.

[ Reply ]


avatar
Maybe Tomorrow 30 [ 1 decade ago ]

I like the concept, and it is obvious that it took you a while. But the halo 3 logos on all the sides are VERY low wuality. Did something go wrong?

[ Reply ]


avatar
Maybe Tomorrow 30 [ 1 decade ago ]

4/5 for effort.

[ Reply ]


avatar
IceFox 42 [ 1 decade ago ]

I'll give it a 4. I like the concept and the effort put into it, and quite honestly it doesn't look too bad. Choppy M logo and a MGS is smashed a bit but other than that it's pretty nice.

[ Reply ]


avatar
E_G 39 [ 1 decade ago ]

Diamond Edition?
I call that over-the-top, maybe it should've been satire to spoof the people who make their Halo 3 boxes so flashy.

I don't know what to rate it.

[ Reply ]


avatar
yoedog0 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm lol??? i'm giving it a 3 becuase i think the dimond is damn sexy the logo's look out of place and there is a black bar on the top just under the 360 header for that i'm lowering my rating sorry :)

[ Reply ]


avatar
NEStendo 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

Not sure what to give this. Looks more like a 20-sided die than a diamond...

[ Reply ]


avatar
steve7702 23 [ 1 decade ago ]

oh this must be the turn based halo game ive been waiting for! who needs D&D anyway.

[ Reply ]


avatar
darklink45 1 [ 1 decade ago ]

a-ok

[ Reply ]